I’m constantly amazed by the complexity of medical terminology. A lot of unnecessary heartache comes from the unappreciated differences in understanding between different parts of the clinical care team and other billing/administrative stakeholders.
In modern healthcare, there are a few words which can trigger a special level of confusion; surprisingly, one of them is the word “inpatient.” It is one of the most context-sensitive, role-dependent words I can think of that is commonly used across the table in healthcare operational and workflow discussions.
What exactly does it mean, how does it work, and how can it be misunderstood?
While I’m not an expert medical historian, the history of the word “inpatient” likely derives from the 200-plus history of healthcare. Most hospitals were not really hospitals as we think of them today; they were charity and alms houses, often with beds, with nuns, nurses, and practitioners/physicians tending to sick and dying patients in them.
While working at a local nearby community hospital, I once interviewed some older nurses who volunteered in our coffee shop, asking them what they remember about the history of the hospital. (If you ever get the chance, ask some older nurses about the history of healthcare — the stories they tell are unbelievable!)
What I learned is that our hospital was once, back in the late 1800s, a simple house on a hill, donated by a local farmer to help tend to the sick in our area. “It was a place where old and sick farmers came to die,” they explained to me. “Then, one day, penicillin arrived. Suddenly, the farmers didn’t die, but actually felt better and wanted to go home.” And voila; the discharge process was born.
Taking care of these patients, 24/7, inside the ‘house’ took a lot of work and attention. Unfortunately, the local community physicians weren’t always available (many had families). So how exactly did they care for patients 24/7 when there were no physicians available?
In most academic hospitals, there were younger student doctors who, as part of their training, agreed to basically live in house — hence the name, “residents.” During training they were basically committed to living inside the house, while the attending providers went home at night to their families.
Meanwhile, in many community hospitals this was probably a complex situation for the nurses, who fought heroic battles to keep their patients alive and comfortable until the morning, when the community providers would return and do morning rounds in the hospital. Remember, it was the 1990s when hospitalist medicine was born; before that, I can only imagine it must have been a difficult situation for nurses who fought for their sickest patients. (If you know any nurses from this era, make sure you appreciate them.)
In any case, from this era of healthcare came two important concepts:
- “Inpatient” – Patients inside the ‘house’/hospital
- “Outpatient” – Patients outside the ‘house’/hospital
During this era, this terminology was probably somewhat helpful in judging patient acuity, e.g.:
- If you were sick enough to need to be in a hospital: inpatient
- If you weren’t, and could walk around: outpatient
And so, healthcare appears to have made it through the 1960s-1970s with those terms mostly intact.
Levels of Care
In the 1960s and 1970s, with increased technology, specialization, and standards, the price of healthcare increased. Eventually payment reform became necessary to help control the costs of this care.
So to help better understand patient acuity and care needs, two terms became important:
- Level of Care: The intensity of effort required to diagnose, treat, preserve, or maintain an individual’s physical or emotional status
- Level of Service: Based on the patient’s condition and the needed level of care, used to identify and verify that the patient is receiving care at the appropriate level.
These terms were stratified to help better organize our healthcare system. In general:
Looking at the above list, one might ask, “Why is the ED considered an outpatient level-of-care/acuity? Don’t they have really sick patients?” The answer is yes, they often do have sick patients. But because of the following factors:
- The modern-day ED grew (circa 1960s-1970s) out of what was once a combination of primary care, urgent care, and the historical “Accident Room” in most hospitals, AND
- Many of the patients seen in an emergency room are treated, fixed, and sent home
- Patients in the ED are usually waiting to be admitted to inpatient levels-of-care/locations
… the ED is an unusual hybrid patient care location, staffed with critical care-trained doctors and nurses, but is still considered an outpatient patient care location (even when they have patients with inpatient acuity needing an inpatient level-of-care).
With regard to nurse training and staffing? Generally, nurses train and staff uniquely in each of these levels-of-care. (Interesting note: Staffing usually depends on the routine vitals!)
Finally, with regard to “bed” management?
- Inpatient beds: A bed with a patient assigned to one of the inpatient levels-of-care, usually (but not always) geographically located in an inpatient area*
- Outpatient beds: A bed with a patient assigned to one of the outpatient levels-of-care, usually (but not always) geographically located in an outpatient area*
*Note: In “bed overflow” situations, it’s entirely possible to “make” an “inpatient” bed in a geographically “outpatient” location; e.g., a patient waiting for an inpatient intermediate/cardiac bed might be physically lying in a bed in an outpatient/ED location, but if they are admitted to the inpatient intermediate/cardiac level-of-care, they are still considered to be an inpatient, in an inpatient bed, “boarding” in the ED/outpatient location. The level-of-care index was at least a little more helpful in roughly estimating a patient’s acuity, and for planning the kind of care that would need to be delivered in these locations.
With these newer, better-defined levels-of-care, some providers started to distinguish themselves and their clinical practices:
- “I do inpatient medicine.”
- “I do outpatient medicine.”
- “I do inpatient neurology.”
- “I do outpatient neurology.”
- “I do inpatient hospitalist work.”
- “I do inpatient pulmonary and critical care.”
And so physicians started to define and stratify themselves — again, with the curious hybrid of the ED, where providers have critical care training but are still considered to be working in an outpatient location, and hence, are technically outpatient providers.
Once upon a time, the terminology was pretty simple:
- Admitted: Admitted to an inpatient level-of-care/location
- Not admitted: Not admitted to an inpatient level-of-care/location
But as the price of healthcare continued to rise in the 1980s, this was too granular a concept, and some payors started to question whether everyone in the hospital really needed to be admitted. Did they all need to be inpatients? Were they all really that sick?
So again, new terminology was developed, to help make a distinction:
- “Inpatient” – Patients who are admitted to an inpatient level-of-care/location, and sick enough to need to stay in the hospital for at least two midnights (E.g. The “sick” sepsis patient with multiple organ failure.)
- “Observation/outpatient” – Patients who are admitted to an inpatient level-of-care/location, but not sick enough to require a stay in the hospital for more than two midnights. (E.g. the long-distance runner who got dehydrated and dizzy, and just needed a night of IV fluids and observation before being sent home.)
Unfortunately, the use of the billing status “inpatient” can be easily confused with the level-of-care/location, “inpatient.”
So it’s entirely possible to have an admitted inpatient:
- With CMS billing status = Observation/outpatient
- Being cared for in bed/level of care = inpatient (med/surg)
- Temporarily boarded in a location = outpatient (ED)
- Until they arrive in their final location = inpatient (med/surg unit)
- Being routinely cared for by their inpatient hospitalist or
- Being emergently cared for their outpatient ED provider (e.g., during a code?)
And during that emergency code, the outpatient ED provider may come to work on the inpatient (currently in observation status) in an inpatient level-of-care/acuity and in an inpatient location, along with nurses trained to deliver inpatient care.
After the code, if the patient is sick and is estimated to require more than 2 midnights of care in the hospital, the inpatient hospitalist may ask the Case Manager to change their CMS Billing Status from observation/outpatient to inpatient.
Makes perfect sense, right? It can be complicated! Unfortunately, our healthcare system is somewhat limited by the lack of terminology development, so I thought I’d summarize it here:
Hope this helps! Need help interpreting or translating during discussions? Ask your own Clinical Informatics, Health Information Management, or other Clinical Operational leadership for help!
Share Your Thoughts
You must be logged in to post a comment.