healthsystemcio.com

Subscribe Via RSS
  • Home
  • About
    • hsCIO.com
    • Register/Login
    • eNewsletter/RSS
    • Categories/Tags
    • FAQs/Policies
    • Social Networking
    • Contact
  • Advisory Panel
  • eNewsletters
  • iTunes
  • Sponsor
    • Sponsorship
    • Speaking
  • Webinars
  • White Papers
    • About
    • Centralize Images w/SOA
    • Vendor-Neutral Archiving
  • RSS

Patient Relationship Mgt. – Just Grab the Ball

Posted by Paul Roemer on July 7th, 2010
Paul Roemer, Managing Partner, HealthcareITStrategy.com

Paul Roemer, Managing Partner, Healthcare ITStrategy.com

Last year, the astronauts on the space shuttle were tasked with replacing some of the software on the Hubble. From what I read, their first task was to remove over a hundred tiny screws, keeping track of each one to ensure the screw did not float away and goof up a billion dollar piece of hardware.

I’ve visited some of the facilities where satellites are built, seen the clean rooms up close. I was scanning NASA’s website looking at pictures of their work on the Hubble. So you can imagine my surprise when after zooming in on a shot of the telescope’s solar panel I saw what appeared to be writing. I zoomed again, doubling the magnification.

It was a sticker. Written on the sticker was the following, “For Service, dial NASA at 1 (800) GET-NASA, if nobody answers, leave a message and we will get back to you within 24 hours. Also available online at www.hubbleservicecenter.com .”

I made that up. There is no sticker, do you know why? NASA doesn’t have a call center. Why? They don’t need one. Why — sorry to be obvious about this, but there are those for which this will be eye opening — they don’t need one because they have to get it right the first time all the time. On those few instances when they don’t get it all right, people die — Columbia. A customer service rep or a technician won’t help. Neither will an IVR, or the latest CRM technology.

NASA plans for success—I actually typed in NSA—but I bet the NSA doesn’t have a call center either. I hate it when my mind wanders off without me.

The reason large providers have call centers, at least in part, is that they are planning for failure. (It’s more expensive than planning to succeed.) Call centers are an expensive and visible sign that failure is expected and accepted. When we add dollars to the budget for the call center for the following year, it is a visible indication that we expect more failure in those twelve months than we had in these twelve months.

Will your call center have more calls in 2010 than in 2009? Yes. Has the number of calls ever decreased year over year? No.

You may ask, “Why do you think we’re spending millions of dollars if all we are doing is planning for failure?” Great question; and it deserves an answer. I think it’s to take care of calls, to manage calls, to compare performance of call answering devices and people against metrics. It’s certainly not to eliminate failure, it’s to efficiently manage failure.

People at NASA don’t run around saying, “Forty percent of our missions fail. We’ve got to get that number down to 35%.” At NASA, failure yields a Congressional hearing.

What would be different if a C-suiter had to personally handle it whenever a patient didn’t understand their bill, or when a clinician missed an appointment? Do you think your executives care? I think if they cared, they would fix the problem, unless they think quality is too expensive.

So, where does that leave the patient relationship management (PRM) discussion? They care and they don’t know what to do (at least that is what the results of a recent survey indicated); or they care, and they know what to do but don’t do it; or they don’t care but they do know what to do. Lastly, they don’t care and they don’t know what to do.

Are the executives at your hospital capable enough to fix the problem? If yes, why haven’t they done anything? If no, why are they still there?  According to the survey, the reason nothing has been done, even though it is a top priority, is they do not know who owns the problem.  Why not own it for them?

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: Blogs, Paul Roemer

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 7th, 2010 at 11:53 AM and is filed under Change Management/Implementation, Hospital Information System, Process Improvement Methodologies. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • eNewsletter Registration

    Join Our Mailing List
    Email:
  • Poll of the Week

    Do you have a clear understanding of ONC's certification requirements around MU?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Most Popular Posts (last 7 days)

    • Evidence-Based Medicine's Giant Leap 210 view(s)
    • Webinars 164 view(s)
    • Advisory Panel 140 view(s)
    • Is Healthcare IT Really Behind Other Industries? 124 view(s)
    • One-on-One w/U of Wisc. Hospitals CIO Mike Sauk (I) 113 view(s)
  • Most Recent Comments

    • Paul Roemer on TEXT/PODCAST: KLAS Finds Providers Underwhelmed By ERP Vendors
    • HMShankwiler on Is Healthcare IT Really Behind Other Industries?
    • garystafford on Is Healthcare IT Really Behind Other Industries?
    • blhayes on Is Healthcare IT Really Behind Other Industries?
    • flpoggio on When Does an Upgrade Become an Opportunity?
  • hsCIO.com Advisory Panel Surveys

    JulyCIOs OK With MU, But Concerned About Peers JuneCIOs Say Poor Communications = Bad Acquisitions MayCIOs Prefer eMAR-First Strategy AprilCIOs Not Bullish on HITECH MarchCIOs Think Certification NPRM Doesn’t Make Grade FebruaryCIOs Feel All-or-Nothing Approach an MU Dealbreaker
  • Categories

    • Acute Business Analytics (BI)
    • Acute Clinical Analytics
    • Acute EMR
    • Acute Financials
    • Acute/Ambulatory Integration
    • Ambulatory EMR
    • Ambulatory PM
    • App Strategy – Enterprise/Suite/Breed
    • ASP/SaaS
    • Budgeting/Forecasting
    • Cardiovascular IS
    • Career Management/Networking
    • Certification
    • Change Management/Implementation
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • Clinician Relations
    • Cloud Computing
    • Community HIS
    • Continuing Education
    • CPOE
    • Dictation/Transcription
    • Disaster Recovery
    • Document Management
    • e-Prescribing
    • eICU
    • eMAR
    • Emergency Department
    • EMPI
    • EMR Financing
    • ERP
    • General Interest/Housekeeping
    • Governance
    • HIE
    • HIT Workforce Shortage
    • HITECH
    • Hospital Information System
    • ICD-10
    • Image Management
    • Implementation/Project Management
    • Infrastructure/Network
    • Integration
    • Laboratory
    • Leadership/Staff Management
    • Liability
    • Meaningful Use
    • Medication Reconciliation
    • Nursing
    • Open Platforms
    • PACS
    • Patient Education/Entertainment
    • Patient Flow Mgt
    • Patient Portals
    • Patient Safety/Quality
    • People Moves
    • Perinatal Care
    • Personalized Medicine/Genomics
    • Pharmacy
    • PHR
    • Physician Portals
    • Platforms
    • Privacy/Security
    • Process Improvement Methodologies
    • RCM
    • Regional Extension Centers
    • Research
    • RIS
    • Robotics
    • Scheduling
    • Standards
    • Stark Deals
    • Storage
    • Supply Chain
    • Telecommunications/VoIP
    • Vendor M&A
    • Vendor Management
    • Wireless
  • Tags

    Allscripts Anthony Guerra Ask the Pros Blogs Bonnie Siegel CCHIT Cerner CHIME CMS Dale Sanders Daniel Morreale David Blumenthal eClinicalWorks Eclipsys Epic GE Healthcare Gerry Higgins HHS HIMSS HIMSS Analytics HIT Policy Committee HIT Standards Committee IBM Information Week Ingenix John Glaser KLAS LSS Marc Holland McKesson Medhost Medicity Meditech MedStar Health Microsoft NextGen ONC one-on-one Pamela McNutt Paul Egerman Paul Roemer Podcast Siemens Healthcare SnapSurvey Steve Huffman

ZinePress Theme by Andrew Lindstrom. Powered by WordPress. Copyright 2010 © healthsystemCIO.com

Podcast powered by podPress (v8.8 / v8.8.6.3)